ConvoRevHelp Center
Menu
Help CenterManageContact support
Topic hub

Manage

Review conversations, give work a clear owner, preserve useful contact context and improve the AI Agent from evidence—not guesswork.

Quick answer

Use one operating loop for daily conversation work

Start in the shared inbox, identify conversations that need attention, assign a responsible person, take the approved action and record the context the next owner needs. When a conversation exposes a knowledge or behavior gap, correct one source of truth and retest before releasing the change.

1 Review2 Own3 Act4 Record5 Improve
Operating model

Turn conversations into controlled work

The Manage workflow connects what the customer said, what the AI Agent did and what the team must do next. Every important conversation should have a visible status, appropriate owner and usable context.

01Review

Find new messages, human requests and conversations waiting for attention.

02Own

Assign the right person or queue and make responsibility visible.

03Act

Reply, follow up, pause automation or complete the approved next step.

04Record

Preserve facts, notes, tags and the reason for any handoff.

05Improve

Correct the source or rule and retest the same scenario.

Activity is not ownership. A notification, assignment or AI reply does not prove that a person reviewed the conversation or that the required next action completed.
Queue priorities

Review the work that needs attention first

Use the inbox as an operating queue rather than a message archive. Prioritize conversations where delay, uncertainty or an incomplete next action creates customer or business risk.

Priority 1

Human attention requested

The customer asked for a person, the AI Agent escalated, or the issue is sensitive, exceptional or unclear.

Action: assign and acknowledge
Priority 2

Next action is incomplete

A booking, estimate, application, purchase step or handoff needs confirmation or follow-up.

Action: verify the destination
Priority 3

New or important message

A contact, assigned conversation or important account requires a timely operational response.

Action: review context and respond
Priority 4

Quality signal

A repeated question, weak answer, unusual objection or routing error may require a controlled improvement.

Action: preserve evidence and test
StartHuman and safety
ThenIncomplete outcomes
ThenAssigned and important
ReviewQuality patterns
Ownership

Give each handoff one responsible owner

Assignment should clarify who is responsible for the next action, when it should happen and which queue remains the fallback if the owner is unavailable.

ConversationCustomer request plus captured context

The message, contact record and AI Agent activity establish what happened.

PersonNamed individual

Use when a specific team member must act.

QueueShared responsibility

Use when an operating team monitors the work.

FallbackUnassigned review

Catch work that cannot reach the intended owner.

  • The reason for assignment is understandable.
  • The owner has access to the conversation and required systems.
  • The expected next action and timing are clear.
  • Absence, reassignment and unassigned work have a fallback.
  • Completion is verified rather than assumed from assignment.
  • Notifications support the queue without replacing review.
Contact context

Store facts, human context and reusable labels separately

Useful contact context helps the next owner understand the customer without rereading every message. Keep structured facts consistent, reserve notes for human context and use tags for approved operational grouping.

Contact recordOne current view of the customer

Information should remain accurate, relevant and traceable to the conversation or approved source.

Fields

Consistent facts

Name, contact details, service interest, qualification answer or another approved structured value.

Useful for search, routing and personalization
Notes

Human context

A concise summary, exception, promise, concern or reason a person should follow up.

Useful for continuity and judgment
Tags

Reusable labels

Approved categories for workflow, source, status, audience or operational grouping.

Useful for filtering and coordination
Collect and retain only what the workflow needs. Do not place credentials, unnecessary private data or sensitive information in a field, note or tag merely because the system allows text.
Automation control

Pause the AI Agent when a person should take over

Pausing automation for one contact protects an active human conversation without changing the Agent for every other customer. Use it deliberately and document what must happen before automation resumes.

DecisionShould the AI Agent continue replying?

Review the request, current owner, sensitivity, exception status and customer preference.

Yes

Continue with monitoring

The request is within approved knowledge and no person is actively handling it.

No

Pause for this contact

A person is taking over, the customer requested one, or the case requires judgment or exception handling.

Define the resume condition

Record who owns the conversation, why the AI Agent was paused and what evidence or completed action permits a safe return to automation.

Evidence-led improvement

Correct the source—not just the visible reply

Keep the affected conversation, identify whether the weakness came from knowledge, instructions, routing, contact context or human process, then change one source of truth and repeat the same test.

01Preserve

Keep the conversation, contact state and observed result.

02Diagnose

Locate the knowledge, behavior, routing or ownership gap.

03Correct

Update one approved source or rule.

04Retest

Repeat the original scenario plus a nearby variation.

05Release

Approve only after the expected behavior is verified.

Observed issueInspect firstVerification
Wrong fact

Approved knowledge source and conflicting versions.

Ask the same question and one related variation.

Wrong action

Agent instructions, ability and escalation rule.

Test the normal path and the stop condition.

Wrong owner

Assignment logic, team access and fallback queue.

Confirm the intended person receives usable context.

Missing context

Contact fields, notes, tags and handoff summary.

Verify the next owner can continue without guessing.

Operating rhythm

Use a repeatable review cadence

Conversation management works best as a defined operating habit. Match the cadence to traffic, risk, team capacity and the response expectations approved for the deployment.

Daily

Clear attention queues

  • Human requests and escalations
  • Unassigned or overdue work
  • Important new messages
  • Bookings and next actions needing confirmation
Weekly

Review quality patterns

  • Repeated unanswered questions
  • Weak handoffs or incomplete context
  • Assignment and notification gaps
  • Contacts paused without a clear owner
After change

Retest affected scenarios

  • Original conversation case
  • Nearby variation and boundary
  • Human handoff behavior
  • Result in the destination system
Guide directory

Manage guides

Follow the sequence from queue operation and ownership through testing, context management and per-contact automation control.

Common questions

Managing conversations

Which conversations should the team review first?

Start with human-attention requests, sensitive or uncertain cases and incomplete next actions. Then review assigned, important and newly active conversations before moving to quality patterns.

Does assigning a conversation mean it has been handled?

No. Assignment shows intended ownership. Confirm that the recipient reviewed the conversation and completed or advanced the approved next action.

When should I use a field, note or tag?

Use fields for consistent facts, notes for concise human context and tags for reusable operational labels. Store only information the workflow needs.

When should the AI Agent be paused?

Pause it for the contact when a person is actively taking over, the customer requests a person, or the case involves ambiguity, sensitivity, an exception or judgment outside the approved scope.

How should we correct a weak AI reply?

Preserve the example, identify the underlying knowledge or behavior source, change one approved source and retest the same scenario before releasing the update.

Need workflow help?

Send one conversation and the expected result

Include the ConvoRev account, channel, safe contact reference, conversation time, AI Agent, current owner or queue, observed behavior and expected next action. Remove credentials and unnecessary private customer information.

Email ConvoRev support